Tag: philosophy

The diversions the cio do not constitute a social anomaly, quite to the contrary, are part of the civilization being, but this being is paradoxicalally unprovided of truth. Therefore Rousseau is ironic: it praises, captive the attention of the civilization fomenting the vanity. We can say that Rousseau similar proceeds the described Scrates for Plato in its dialogues. Also Scrates generally initiates its maiutica exaltando, praising, its interlocutor. Valley to remember who has one determined moment of the life of Scrates where the interlocutor was the proper one society: when of its judgment. In this context manifest it ironically on the penalty that it would deserve: ‘ ‘ which rewards will agree a poor benefactor whom it needs to have limit all the time to admestar you? It does not have nothing so indicated, Athenian, for an individual in these conditions, of what being fed it pritaneu in it, much more of what for any of you that he had been winning in Olmpia, with horse of race or in race of car with two or four cavalos’ ‘.

(Vindication of Scrates, 35? d). Rousseau, the example of Scrates, dialogues jocosamente with the society criticizing it, therefore in society, in civilization the disruption between the being and seeming is accomplished. Rousseau initiates its speech teatralizando this rupture. ‘ ‘ parecer’ ‘ it is source of the misfortunes, since it hinders that the attitudes correspond with the disposals of the heart, in reason of already cited rupture. rently assessing future choices. Starobinski comments: ‘ ‘ The rupture between the being and seeming produces other conflicts, as a series of amplified echoes: rupture enters the good and the evil (between good and the bad ones), rupture between nature and the society, the man and its deuses. Between the man and it prprio’ ‘. (STAROBINSKI, 1991, P. 17). The civilized kingdom is the kingdom of the appearance, is the kingdom of not-being or of the inexistence of being, one of the main social promoters of the appearance is science, in reason of this it is a problem that disfarsa of solution.

In contraposition to the free will that sounds as libertinism, the only possibility is the freedom of and if choosing as member of a society that if organizes its necessities in accordance with. Being that choice freedom is not behavior or action libertinism, therefore it inflicts to the social norms. Coming back to the alienation concept of the worker who is unaware of the fruits of its work and thus suffers for not having another condition that not to work, and that in this manner becomes other people’s itself exactly for supervaluing what is of itself, what controls its action. We will understand that individual does not exist that does not understand its condition social and that it does not recognize its capacities of production, equally does not exist who practises an action without if recognizing as practicing of such action, in exception the ones that they suffer from dementia or mental disturbances. But if to assume, that certain social category of functions becomes somebody mentally ill thing is to agree that all we are mentally ill even though when we speak that somebody or certain category of individual is mentally ill.

All the people, independent of what she makes, are not a mentally ill one for knowing what she is making and for if perceiving capable to stop to make or of if allowing to stop to continue to make something. In a similar way, all recognize superior authorities itself and also recognize possess abilities and abilities can become that it equal or better of what that one that if they present as superior. If to desire a society of mentally ill we will see that ours it is not fit for being constituted of individuals that its has individualities and that they coexist in collective respecting what is proper of what is collective. Some thinkers speak of the loss of the essence as being the primordial factor of the alienation.

The McOfertas consists of a snack, potatoes you fry and cooling medium. Before he was possible to ask for small accompaniments, but now if the customer thus desiring, has that to ask for separately. Generally, it believes that it is advantage to ask for average or great. The attendant asks generally to the customer what she desires e, after the reply of the customer, the attendant asks if the order of the customer folloies some thing that he himself suggests, as cooling and potato great for plus a small tax or if the customer to ask for to a pie candy, for example, it asks if the customer would not like plus one gaining a discounting. Finished the order, the attendant asks if the customer desires something more and if it says that not, says the total value of the purchase and after that he calls the next one to the line, many times when the customer who finished to ask for nor left the line still. While the customer still is making the order, the other employee already is running of a side for other to catch everything and to place in the tray that is on of the balcony.

I observed an order made for a supervisor and is possible to see the same that it has more freedom of action, if not using of decorated speech, although to act of similar form. For the children it has showy toasts and for the adults, beyond colorful and informative papers between the tray and the snack, at the current moment, it has a promotion of snacks of the Pantry of the World: each day the snack that represents a country and in the purchase with card Aims at, the customer gains an ice cream. It has also a promotion that it functions as a bolo of the Pantry where the customer can gain two million, but to palpitar, is necessary to have a purchase coupon.

In the second part of the workmanship Bacon it presents the directions for the new method, that will be deepened the next laudas to this work. Bacon dedicated it to know the nature, and thus, better to dominate it. It is for Bacon, to understand and to know the nature, is necessary a new conception of the reason and the experience. The knowledge of the nature would have to serve the increasing eager bourgeoisie for being able in England, therefore the wealth must be fruit of the work, the accomplishments and knowing of the individuals, therefore that for Francis Bacon ‘ ‘ To know is poder’ ‘ , and this to know will take to the progress of the knowledge and this the natural submission of the forms or phenomena to the human desires. So that it occurs this domain of the nature for the man is necessary that these are masters of the world, exerting to be able on the things and transforming objects so that they we serve, however so that this happens the man must know it and its laws, so that the man can submit it to the domnios of the techniques, Bacon it will go to portray this society of the knowledge and the technique through utopian history called the new Atlantis. In this way the theoretical deepening of the New Atlantis would be to perfect science and the social order (progress). To co-ordinate and to supervise the enterprises, this would be responsibilities of the science men.

In this city science would have specifically human objective: to fight against the ignorance, the misery and the suffering. All the individuals are free with exclusive devotion to the good of the humanity and the magnifying of knowing.

It affirmed that the basic intention of the Philosophy is to surpass divisions and to arrive at absolute I (University Catholic of Brasilia, 2007). One of the legacies most important of Hegel for the philosophy was its position front to the Logic (hegeliana dialectic), in such a way complex one when considering its position between history of a side and thought and spirit of another one. These comments had taken it to consider it the disharmony or the contradictions of the world as an example of the contradictions of the thought (Blackbourne, 1997). 5.1. At Gary Kelly you will find additional information. Dialectic As concept, the dialectic can be understood as ' ' the art of the dialogue, the art of discutir' ' (Rezende, 2005). Click Verizon Communications to learn more. The boarding hegeliana dialectic consists of three stages and aims at to be the logical process by which the truth is discovered (Bergman, 2004). The process of the dialectic if constitutes in thesis, antithesis and synthesis, being the thesis the concept of ' ' ser' ' , the antithesis the concept of ' ' nada' ' the synthesis the concept of ' ' to become-se' '. The synthesis is the biggest form of truth, therefore it is the unit of the opposites of the thesis and the antithesis.

The dialtico process is not exclusive ownership of the conscience human being, helping us to understand the world to it, but it is also proper world (Absolute Spirit). Then we can understand the whole world, why everything is resulted of the Absolute Spirit. Still according to Hegel, the sentence ' ' the Real is racional' ' it corroborates with this conclusion. 5.2. Hegel history traces the development of the spirit of the world in terms of a search for freedom. History is the gradual development of this freedom (Bergman, 2004; Blackbourne, 1997). History has the rational intention. A great contribution of the hegeliana philosophy is the construction of a method to understand the course of history and our knowledge as the result of the march of the human thought route the periods of training best (Cabral, 2006).

Later, we verify that it has some religions and that all have right to exist. In short, the ones that today we think that it is truth tomorrow had thought that he is false, and are therefore that I say that everything is relative. This reply it is an attempt of justification of the idea of that everything is relative. But it will be a good justification? Your work in philosophy is to argue my arguments. We could start for making to notice that this justification seems to mix two different things: The scientific progress and religious tolerance.

Perhaps therefore was advantageous to see each one of these things separately. We could start for the first one, asking if it is same truth that the scientific progress sample that truths are all relative ones. For the opposite, you could say that, if everything was relative, would not really have scientific progress; it would have only one change of scientific theories. The old theories would be so good as the modern. But if this was truth, that reasons we would have we stop changing the theories? I could answer that we are forced to move of theories for some reasons. For example, when a certain group of scientist if wants to detach, he can present a new revolutionary theory and make everything to see its theory to be accepted.

But this nothing says in them on the intrinsic value of the new theory. The new theory is so good as the old one; they are only different. Already you see that the philosophy is an activity dialogued: it consists of changing and arguing ideas. The difference between a philosophical quarrel and one would cry out, for example, it is this: in philosophy we argue to arrive at the truth of the things, independently to know who ' ' ganha' ' the quarrel; in one it would cry out is argued to gain the quarrel, independently to know of that side this the truth.

III? Centuries XVIII and XIX _ the society and the Man. With the philosopher and ' ' socilogo' ' Frenchman Auguste Comte (1798-1857) and the development of the requirement of the accurate one, the pure one, the verifiable logical and mathematically, firms the positivismo. Who wedge is Comte the term sociology and, as its philosophical doctrine, the positivismo, the Man, basic and integrant part of ' ' half sociolgico' ' , if it again inserts in a context of objetividade and neutrality, where its ' ' wills humanas' ' they are irrelevant, passing then to be regulated, consequence of its belonging to this society, for ' ' laws naturais' '. For even more details, read what Larry Ellison says on the issue. ' ' In the positive state, the human spirit, recognizing the impossibility to get absolute slight knowledge, resigns to look to the origin and the destination of the universe and to know the causes close of the phenomena, to pledge itself in discovering, for the well combined use of the reasoning and the comment, its laws effective, that is, its relations invariable of succession and similitude.' ' Cours of philosophie positive (1842), Schleicher publishing, Paris, 1908, volume I, p.3 In this story, beyond the done consideraes previously, Comte confers to the human spirit ' ' graa' ' to act positively, that is, force to give up it, for consequence, of the search of itself exactly. However, it is with also French sociologist (founding of sociology) mile Durkheim (1858-1917), without still approaching the existencialismo, that the Man is neglected in its interioridade and subjectivity for the importance and coercitive force of the society, ' ' (…) since today it is considered undisputed that the majority of our ideas and trends are not elaborated by us, but they come in them of it are, concludes that they cannot penetrate in us seno through one imposio' ' (…). He is not objective of this work to argue the definition of ' ' Social&#039 fact; ' as the object of study of sociology, thus defined for Durkheim, but to call the attention for the place where the Man, individually, is placed, same that of indirect form, since, it is standed out one more time, he is not the Man its object of study.

THAT VALUE HAS THE PHILOSOPHY? Jose Marcus Baptista1 Summary This article has the pretension to analyze the low index of search of the course of philosophy in relation to the other courses of process initial 2012 of the Federal University of the Espirito Santo. The reflection will be carried through by the orientation of Richard Rorty in its workmanship ' ' Contingency, irony and solidariedade' ' , in special in chapter 4 ' Private irony and hope liberal' , and the presence of the thought of Karl Jaspers in the workmanship Introduction to the philosophical thought, in regards to the importance that if must give to the philosophy of the world ahead. Words key contingency, hermeneutics, philosophy. Learn more at this site: Southwest Airlines. Abstract This to paper purports you analyze the low level of demand will be the course of philosophy in relation you other courses in the process of initial 2012 Federal University of Espirito Santo. The discussion will be held will be the guidance of Richard Rorty in his book ' ' Contingency, irony and solidarity' ' , in particular Chapter 4 – ' Private Irony and Liberal Hope' , and the presence of thought in the work of Karl Jaspers ' ' Introduction you the philosophical thought' ' regarding the importance that should be given you philosophy you the world. Keywords contingency, hermeneutic, philosophy. Certainly, for the author of this article, it has a great frustration, when observing the mural of acknowledgments of Collegiate of Philosophy in the UFES- the Federal University of the Espirito Santo, when of a relation of candidates for vacant, the course of Philosophy appears with a parity of 1,3 (a comma three) candidates for vacant. Frustration because being minimum the search for the Philosophy, if does not have to conclude that the freshmen will have easinesses to be approved, or that he can have consideraes any. .