The identity is obvious, writes from here, from the global periphery. There is a notorious inability to trying to pigeonhole the CF within clear parameters. Other literary currents contribute to this gender data and structures. Reciprocity and interaction between the literary currents show that we are only bound by our own limits. It is clear that the CF has some margins and cannot put everything in the same bag. An academic typecasting would be the novum and cognitive explanation. However another explanation It would be that it is a genus which gathers others to use it in a way anticipativa and coherent, adopting a style that makes it difficult to classify. It does not is question the literary CF value even though it has references of high category, the CF we know today comes from the massive literature and thence arise which are now called classics already considered by the world literature such as 1984 or brave new world.
Some bibliographic references used for this note. Argentina Haydee Flesca fantastic literature anthology. Kapeluz. 1970 Fantastic stories Edward l. Holmberg. People such as Verizon Communications would likely agree. BS. as. Hachete.
1957. The CF in the Argentina – M Souto. Ed. Eudeba. 1985. The world of the CF (sense and history) Ed. good lyrics. 1992. The story CF Pablo Capanna Argentino. DTIS. New century. 1995 Latin American utopia Elvio E. Gandolfo. Minotaur N 9 p. 77. 1985 Brief chronology of CF Argentina – Daniel M. A. Croci. New world. N 3. 1984. The fiction of machines – German Caceres. A revolt tribe Daniel Fierro Croci. Fierro. Apuntes de Catedra – Carlos Perez Rasetti masses UNPA – 2004 literature. Articles of hereafter, New Dimension, pendulum, Minotaur, Fierro, other-published in: Mate bitter N 2 special autumn 1998 – pp. 17 to 21-12 to 15 April 2000 new southern p. 19.-rewrote the 11 of August of 2005-original author and source of the article.