Traunstein Shall Issue

In a final judgment of the Landgericht Traunstein, the business basics of PRKG is legally underpinned for the umpteenth time. In the current case, an applicant tried to proceed with all possible charges against the “machinations of the Park rooms KG”. She was represented Sahiba & Walker of the renowned law firm, working as contract lawyers of the ADAC. Specifically following allegations against the Park rooms KG have been made: 1 supposedly property owners no right had to instruct the Park rooms KG (short PRKG) because he had leased the land to a supermarket. In the final judgment, the Court clarified that the owner even understandable had the right to he there while the store had, but not leased its parking. Thus the damage incurred directly by wrong parking and he must sit down, using the PRKG, against the “Besitzstorer” to the military.

The transfer of all rights and obligations to the removal of the faults of the acquis was through the PRKG demonstrated and it is therefore indisputable. The “illegality hoped for by the applicant” did not see the Court. 2. in addition, the applicant has claimed it no date be come to pay on the spot because no employee of PRKG spot had been. The Court did not follow the, because the applicant and her husband the time window had held so briefly, that it can be said that there had been no local staff. 3. Furthermore, the applicant has claimed that she have prompted the PRKG in writing, indicating the accounts so that she could transfer.

This letter is never received the PRKG, unfounded the applicant, it must be arrived at, did not follow the Court also. 4. after the applicant was unwilling to pay the costs, she first sought your vehicle on your own and this was finally almost three months later. She wanted to have reimbursed by the PRKG any resultant repair costs due to the long service life. The Court saw no reason for this. 5. at long last, also the Landgericht Traunstein noted that the required 270.-EUR are not so high, that is an abuse of rights. To sum up the Park rooms KG got thus right in all respects. Another judgment, that the business model of the Park rooms KG as well as the amount of the costs are legitimate.