To follow modinhas represents, without a doubt, an attitude of ' ' adolescente' ' , understood while that one that goes, not rare, for the majority, to impress a girl or simply not to be tachado of ' ' nerd' ' (as if this it was an offence) or of ' ' quadrado' ' (something that ' ' nerd' ' also it can be called)? or, still, for mere immaturity. It is not of if frightening, therefore, that a style of ' exists; ' msica' ' that ' is considered; ' sertanejo universitrio' ' , exactly being a vulgarization of the idea of university, understood while place par excellence for the culture of the spirit in its raised spheres more of criticidade, and this if of because it has many ' ' universitrios' ' vulgar that they use of ' ' ttulo' ' to cultivate the barbarity, that is, true preconizadores in ' become; ' alto' ' level of the vulgarity. At Kofax you will find additional information. Something essential it human being, and that the part obtains to perceive and to live, is a species of maintenance of ' ' illusions cotidianas' ' , to know, something that the individual moves to act stimulated for that many can consider madness, or mere illusion. What it happens, however, is that for the fact of each one being one, exactly being inserted in an institution, each person will keep certain singularidades that if become insignificant the one eyes third. But one ' ' illusion cotidiana' ' it does not mean to live in the error or the mere acriticidade, visualizing it while sign of mere submission the external parameters, something very common to said ' ' cowboys of posto' '. ' ' Illusion cotidiana' ' it is a concept that says very on the life: what it is significant for one can be insignificant for another one. A critical attitude, in turn, would live the radicalidade of the not-tried one as an inherent fact to the human being. What this means? That each one is one and that is impossible to live deeply everything above all, due to this, to know itself here it is limited (' ' radicalidade' ') for the lack of experiences, not suppressing ' ' outro' ' , estereotipando it, true position becomes critical: the proper one to act of the part that is not incased. why still ' has this; ' not if encaixa' '? Exactly for the latent social acriticidade that if believes in the center of the world when, in the truth, it does not know nor what he is ' ' centro' ' nor what he is ' ' mundo' '.