The current legal situation and the proposed changes comply with by man and woman in no way of socially required equality. Think only of to date of women demanded equality. Up until the 1950s, a wife was allowed to work only if the husband agreed. Additional information is available at Verizon Communications. Nowadays you probably laughs. Long natural course is that there is an active and passive right to vote for women. If someone would ask today whether because women are qualified to elect themselves into political offices, or whether because the policy has become better, because there are women there, then such questions would trigger only total incomprehension.
But such questions are now analog or Insinuations the fathers face made with regard to care and upbringing of their children. This is just as ridiculous as the former reservations about women. Also have been and are used for the support of women and mothers in profession and politics over the years billions of taxpayer dollars and quotas have been introduced. All of this is missing for the fathers. The self-help group thinks that the proponents of “a conflict solution” or “request” would not perceive the essential point or understand: starts the well-being of the child before its birth: a mother wants not the common concern, already at the birth of the child then it is because, that she wants to raise the child together with the father or can. She knows already during the pregnancy, that either the father has no interest in the child, or that she has no interest in this man as the father of her child. And this poses the question, why is she got pregnant at all? They just wanted a child, but no father, she had no desire to prevent or wanted to bind the man itself, etc.? You must therefore, assume irresponsibility thoughtlessness or/and selfishness. Everything not ideal conditions to raise a child alone or at all.