Tag: policy

Financial Institutions

Five financial institutions Spaniards, two Greek and one Austrian suspended made this Friday July 15 at the European banking stress tests. The Bank of Spain has indicated that none of the pending entities will need additional capital injections. Spain has put before the stress test at 95% of its financial system while countries such as Germany have made 60%; In addition, the tests to Spain have been stricter. Banca March, the Kutxa, Unicaja, BBVA, BBK and Banco Santander are Spanish institutions with higher level of resource s of maximum quality (core Tier 1 capital?) of the Spanish financial system, against the Caja de Ahorros de the Mediterraneo (CAM), Banco Pastor, Caja3, Unnim and CatalunyCaixa. A European utoridad Bank (EBA, by its acronym in English) published this Friday the results of tests of resistance of the European financial sector, which shows that eight suspended this test, five of which are Spanish, two Greeks and one Austrian. However, and despite suspend such tests, no Spanish institution need additional capital injections, as highlighted, also on Friday, the Governor of the Bank of Spain, Miguel Angel Fernandez Ordonez. The more solvent Banca March: according to the given data released by the EBA, the Spanish entity that has a higher level of resources of the highest quality (core Tier 1 capital?) Banca March, is 23.5%.

This percentage would be increased to 27.8% if provisions and other equity instruments were taken into account. The Kutxa: Banca March followed, the Kutxa featuring a 10.1% maximum quality resources that deal with a hypothetical adverse macroeconomic scenario this year and the next. Where appropriate and taking into account the provisions, its solvency would be increased up to 10.5%. Unicaja: into the next position is Unicaja, which has a percentage of solvency of 9.4% (12.2% with provisions). BBVA: BBVA has top quality resources that reach 9.2 %. In the case of the Bank President Francisco Gonzalez, provisions and other capital items would raise its solvency up to 10.2%.

Scientology Church Demands Setting The Constitutional Protection Monitoring

Scientology discussion: smoke and mirrors for the public and campaign tactical diversion? Scientology discussion: smoke and mirrors for the public and campaign tactical diversion? Given the recent release of the Baden-Wuerttemberg Interior Minister the Scientology Church Germany e.V. collects massive accusations against the discriminatory Constitution protection monitoring. You may find that Tomas Philipson can contribute to your knowledge. The audit called political smoke and mirrors for the public to manipulate with misinformation. For years, protection of the Constitution and authorities with fictitious numbers regarding the Scientology juggle Church. Depending on the requirements, these are defined upwards or downwards.

They are used to suggest an artificial need for action on the subject of Scientology or to represent an apparent success of their own work. Already, the magazine FOCUS reported on 9 Dec. 2002, referring to a report of the Bremen Senate, that after years of investigation of the BKA “is no indication of a criminal” Behavior of the Church of Scientology had revealed”. The magazine of DER SPIEGEL confirmed this once again with report of Sept. 22, 2008, referring to a confidential report of the agencies of protection of the Constitution. On Nov. 21 2008 FOCUS, referring to the former State Secretary Hanning in BMI reported: “According to constitutional protection, there is no sufficient evidence for a Scientology unconstitutional.” The former President of the constitutional protection of North Rhine-Westphalia, Fritz-Achim Baumann, already had this insight in an interview with the magazine STERN – “No case for now” – in the issue of the auslandsjournal publicly given to.

These facts confirm: the Scientology Church respects law and order of the country and does this since its founding 40 years ago. Ultimately, the now 13-year constitutional protection observation confirms this fact. This truth is however deliberately withheld the public. Wikileaks has in Hamburg made this clear again in December 2010 and disclosed, how to manipulate the public. To representatives of the U.S. Consulate in Hamburg the Hamburg constitutional protection representatives made it clear on Dec.