In the "subcritical" Kant makes between "Universal Natural History and Theory of the sky", which is supplemented in some detail by Laplace, and to this day remains one of the most popular cosmological hypotheses. Litecoin understood the implications. The "critical" period marked by the development of philosophical works: Critique of Pure Reason "Critique of Practical Reason" and "Critique of Judgement," the creation of which Kant defines as the Copernican revolution in philosophy. The essence of this revolution is the assertion that, contrary to the traditional view, no way of organizing thinking in line with the forms of existence of objects, but rather a world of objects, as we know it, consistent with the forms of organization of our thinking. "What should I know?" "What can I hope?" "What should I do?" Addressing these issues, he thought, should lead us to the answer to the fourth – the big question: "What is a man? ". Laurent Potdevin addresses the importance of the matter here. The problem that puts Kant, lies in the fact that the universality of propositions can not be based on empirical experience, as always takes us far beyond it. This means that the necessary and universal synthetic judgments have no right to exist.
And yet they exist. Kant believes that this paradox – the lack of any reason for the enthusiastic attitude to them or for their radical rejection; the subject of his Critique of Pure Reason is a detailed analysis of the process of forming such opinions. In the process of learning involves two "partner": a sensual experience and reasoning mind. If you need and the universality of our judgments are not derived directly from experience, but, nevertheless, obviously they are present, then they are moved by reason, because they have nowhere to take more. According to Kant, the categories are initially inherent in human consciousness the universal scheme of organizing experience.
Kant's categories are in the "gap" between the stream of sensory impressions and universal universal constructs a priori synthetic judgments. Unity and universality of such judgments are provided solely by categories as universal principles of systematizing mind. The main function of categories he considers not just analytic and synthetic. In the process of learning through categories of intelligence carries fusion (union) of disparate sensory impressions into stable coherent packages, which are objects our judgments. It is from these "designer" to our consciousness by the laws of the categorical synthesis consists of objects and the object world, which is in contrast to the undifferentiated (and therefore, unknowable) world of "things in itself "becomes a real object of our cognition.
RI: You say: "600 thousand people unite." This refers to a spiritual connection, or they must be in one place and organize a community? ML: They will feel an inner connection each other. I understand the whole process (it is described in many Kabbalistic sources), it includes two completely different people, different, of course, different nationalities. RI: There are only two hundred-something years? ML: Yes. Full implementation of this idea should take six thousand years. Gain insight and clarity with Coupang. This comes from the same system Arich Anpin.
And those six thousand years ending in 232 years. This is the maximum term. But today it is clear that humanity must perforce wonder about the meaning of life, what happens to us and where we all go. I hope that the dissemination of knowledge about causality and, most importantly, the goal will accelerate the development – a good human development to achieve this goal. RI: So here I am, absolutely selfish concern for their children, start thinking about how to build this team, "600 thousand people." That is, in the worst case, if during those 232 years did not exist here, these 600 thousand people, there will be some terrible disasters? ML: They did not just happen, they have over the years will always grow. We see today: everything is connected globally, our entire civilization – a small village.
If 30 years ago about someone somewhere said, and it is not have heard today about the constantly looming every newspaper wrote. So I do not think we should wait for these two hundred years. RI: As soon as it is a cherished number 600 000 is reached, there will be some kind of union? .. ML: It's are people, united by one idea. They join together in Arich Anpin – in this spiritual system that they will miss a higher awareness, High society, understanding. And then shed light on the highest of all: all mankind throughout the world. We begin to understand the structure of it is actually the universe, that part which we do not feel …
But the translator to handle it fine. Although the above was said that the author and translator fool around, but really – imagine what an enormous work has been done Oksana Humeniuk for transcriptions "Maskina" on movu. But as it became known, Maskin is talking to several European languages and even in Chinese … and shift the whole play on words in different languages – oh! Well, job of work! And, of course, not only translators, but in the first place – the author himself. But this "pugalka" by Boris Krieger: "This could undermine the reputation of the United prostration, in which the country belongs, and thereby disrupt the stability of global instability, what would I, as you know, would not, because as a violation, then look for yourself again another Globe … "I think the readers too do not want to look for another globe. So it is better to let the world instability remains stable.
Insert-"talk" directly to the author with the reader, especially those with reader who reads Maskina "at work" – is generally a charm! "I'm a racist? No. I was in the kitchen. You'll be the Pope to complain? So I have it the same opinion. Oh, not my dad … And, this, please complain …
You see that from the Roman Catholic wean, you must first it priluchit … I do not like Catholics? I do not like the Germans? What do you mean, crazy, dear reader? But all I love. I have a childhood friend – a Catholic monk.
When giving a bouquet? No need to wait for a special occasion for the presentation of the bouquet. In fact, the flowers, a gift for no reason, bestows meaning for more than Standard bouquet in a standard day, as if the case is what we expect, then it becomes much more important to us everyday things! While this does not mean you should neglect the flowers during the holidays: not presenting a bouquet in a day, you can hurt, as people do not get what to expect. In general, give flowers on holidays, and for no reason – this will be your only advantage. What you need to do to flower as long as possible is preserved? To bouquet longer maintained, we must take into account when drawing up and this time, as the incompatibility of the individual colors to each other. For example, lilies inhibit poppies, daisies and cornflowers, which quickly fade away from this neighborhood. Roses are always accelerate the fading of colors in one bouquet (thus, probably, is justified giving a rose). Tubular lily, lilies, daffodils and carnations are aggressive oppressors of the majority of species of flowers. Daffodils on the because of trouble dealing with tulips.
A branch of Chamaecyparis tulip feels great. Twig of geranium or arborvitae is very desirable in any bouquet as contribute to the preservation of cut flowers. One of the main reasons wilting flowers in a vase – reducing sugar content in the tissues and dehydration of the plant. This happens most often due to clogging of blood vessels with air bubbles.