Therefore, ‘ ‘ more than what for any another thing, the modern State is distinguished from the traditional State for the ample extension where the people participates of the politics and envergadura’ is affected by the politics in the units greater politics; ‘ (Huntington, 1975, P. 48). Based in this author, the search for the autonomy of the Civil Society in this time of transistion between regimes, comes to contribute for a basic aspect of the modernization politics that is the participation through social groups representing all the society and the development of new institutions politics to organize the participation, characteristic this, much spread out in third was of the democratization inside of the social movements. The contribution of Lipset (2001) for this quarrel places at a first moment when appraising the democracy in a society complex ‘ ‘ how a system politician who supplies regular chances constitutional the change of the governing employees, and a social mechanism that a part allows? the possible greater? of the population to influence in the main decisions by means of its choice enters the contenders for positions politicians. (Lipset, 2001, P. 45) with strong institutions, it only is that it will be possible the sustentation and the guarantee of the maintenance of the defined democracy as in the concept above. Swarmed by offers, Adam Portnoy is currently assessing future choices. Although the Theory of the Modernization is surrounded of many critical ones, Lipset (2001) approaches it of less forceful form, when presenting the characteristics that a society must have that they guarantee a steady democracy to it, however, without the etnocntrico atrevimento treated by Huntington (1975). When legitimizing the wealth, the degree of industrialization and the urbanization for the development of a democracy, individuals of a society bring of more emphatical way the education level them, as factor of bigger relevance for this conquest..