It is a mistake to think that in the hands of the manager more control over execution of the subordinate. If another you as the head man is not subject. And whatever you do – it calls for, explain, criticize, punish, inspire and flattered in hopes that workers will make what you want. Required to form another installation, a different understanding: unlike Labour leader of working artist is that leadership success is measured by its success of subordinates, and depends on them is in their hands, while success artist to a great extent depends on his personal efforts. Therefore, you need to talk about implementing the remote control.
The task of this control is further complicated by the fact that no matter how people were selected, all of them are by nature different: each has its own style and motivation. Secret number 2. High effectiveness is achieved if and only if, when the head articulates the goals, sets the parameters achieve the desired result and allows the artist to search for ways to achieve goals. The truth about the role of managers if manager can not "drive the hands" of subordinates, then for what he did needed? What is the return on it? Do not you think that the success of the manager and his "cost" to the external labor market and within your company's success is akin to coach a sports team? Understand how and what the performance reserves in each team member to find ways to remove them and put at the service to achieve command objectives, to maximize the focus on achieving the desired result. And repeat as many times as needed. At It is very often not be much involved personally in achieving this result the team. Is not it so? Very close to what makes a chemical test tube outwardly neutral in the reactions of a substance and known as the "catalyst".