Therefore, consonant Light (2006: 43) ' ' a proposal to be able to seem true for somebody, it has to seem probably true, in some measure. supports Moser, what it becomes a probable proposal is some type of evidncia' '. In these conditions, we need only probabilities and certezas not to accept some proposal, however, one perceives that it uses itself of the falibilismo as support of its fundacionista theory. In agreement the Moser, the thesis of the auto-probability possesss many problems, since, is difficult to define if such proposal is really auto-probable or not, as well as contradictory, therefore, in the ontolgica thesis I am, I I exist, necessarily to be true, first I have that to think, to have wills and to doubt. Then, it needs certain evidences to be considered true, however, he is confused if it is a thesis of conditional Auto-probability to the truth or needs evidences to have some truth, however, it is not auto-probable. Contanto, for Light (2006: 45), when we consider a proposal as auto-probable due to the terms constitute that it, we are, in the truth, considering that this proposal true must to the use of such and such terms.
However, it supports Moser, ' ' we do not have to confuse conditions for the evidencial probability with conditions for verdade' '. It is not difficult also to understand that the thesis of the auto-probability tends to lead to the infinitismo, let us see an example. I am, I I exist, Discarding I defined this ontologia for the o reason that, it thought, it doubted, it I felt. But, he guarantees what me that it really thinks, he doubts and he feels? Thus, he will have then that to prove the veracity of that it really thinks, he feels and he doubts. Later that to find such reply that it proves the veracity, it guarantees what me that this reply really possesss truths enough to affirm that the reply of that ' ' it pensa' ' or ' ' it duvida' ' she is really true? Thus, Light (2006: 46) question ' ' Somebody can, only based in the proposals that compose the return, to accept the antecedent of this connective? ' ' For Moser, hardly not, therefore, the epistmico citizen will need the definition ' ' pensar' ' ' ' duvidar' ' for only thus, to justify the belief I am, I I exist.