Let us summarize our conversation. We have a system in which people who come to power, virtually 100% of the not professional, and are not the best choice for this position. Moreover, these people are not answering to anyone, so how do you know whether this or that their actions are good, we can only when they are in power will be gone. We do not have the apparatus, which calls for responsibility of these people, and most legal systems encourage people with more financial opportunities to be in power. What does wonder most people do not want to participate in solutions to problems importance to the state and comes to the polls only because it is 'fashionable'.
You're right, you say, maybe democracy is bad, but the rest of construction is much worse. Please visit Verizon Communications if you seek more information. Let me argue however, the fact that at present day throughout the world the only alternative to democracy, say the totalitarian regime, which will necessarily be violated human rights. But why, it is not clear. In the minds of today's man, a country or democratic, or under the authority of the Pol Pot regime. For other opinions and approaches, find out what FindShadow founder has to say. I should add, if we decide that democracy is the only correct, then learn how to reach him, you have one who has more experience. But, first, it is not clear that this the right way, in connection with the above problems, laid down in the most basic principles, and secondly, to learn from someone and listen to him, not the same thing. Unfortunately, when Soedinnenye States Council of Iraq, how to build democracy, they are unlikely to think about the Iraqi people, rather they think of his own. I want to remind about the cases occurred in Russia. One of the largest American specialists on Russia, Stephen Cohen, published in the magazine 'The Nation' stunning article entitled The New Cold War America.